Skip to main content

Terraxis Blog and Press

Check our latest news & activities!

Blog

Workplace Mediation Workshop: Key Insights & Takeaways

15 September 2026

Topics covered:

Voluntary Participation in Workplace Mediation – Misuse of Mediation – Shifting Intentions Before and During Mediation

How an Independent Workplace Investigation Resolved Complex Organisational Conflict

09 September 2026

Independent Workplace Investigation Case Study

How an Independent Workplace Investigation Resolved Complex Organisational Conflict

A multinational organisation in Switzerland faced escalating internal conflict, loss of psychological safety, and serious concerns regarding its work environment. Following several investigation triggers, including allegations of discrimination and workplace misconduct, the organisation commissioned independent external investigators through Terraxis. The investigation provided an objective factual record, identified critical misconduct, recommended appropriate corrective action, and strengthened organisational trust and compliance.

Case Study Overview

  • Client: Confidential (Multinational Employer)
  • Client Industry: Financial Services
  • Client Location: Geneva, Switzerland
  • Project Duration: 3 weeks
  • Services Provided: Workplace Investigation
  • Workplace Investigation Lead: Jérémie Girod, Workplace Investigator and Managing Director of Terraxis.

Key Outcomes

  • Independent, evidence-based workplace investigation process delivered with full confidentiality.
  • Misconduct and leadership breakdown identified; corrective actions effected.
  • Stress-related sick leave in affected teams dropped by 40% in three months.
  • Protected business continuity; delivered two at-risk projects on schedule. 
  •  Internal “Person of Trust” scheme and safe reporting channels implemented

The Challenge - When Workplace Conflict Endangers People & Performance 

The organisation, a Swiss-headquartered multinational, was experiencing persistent tensions within a key division. Employee complaints to Human Resources and line management had escalated over two years, culminating in claims of discrimination, chronic workload inequality, and a serious loss of trust in the internal process.

Senior HR professionals and management needed to determine:

  • Where did misconduct truly occur?
  • Were leadership practices discriminatory or merely perceived as such?
  • What legal risks under Swiss law arose around psychological safety, duty of care, and bias? (See: Swiss Code of Obligations – Workplace Protection)
  • The matter required a formal Initial Assessment, including a comprehensive risk assessment, to determine whether immediate interim measures or administrative leave were necessary to protect employees and preserve the integrity of the process. 

Early findings suggested potential breaches of the organisation's Code of Conduct and other internal workplace policies governing respectful behaviour, discrimination, and management practices.

The impacts were systemic:

  • Employees altered behaviour, avoided formal complaints, and feared retaliation.
  • Absenteeism spiked.
  • Two strategic projects halted due to deteriorating team cohesion.
  • Managers and HR were accused of partiality or indifference.

The gravity required an independent, externally led workplace investigation to reclaim trust and establish facts reliably.

What the Workplace Investigation Revealed

The Terraxis investigation, grounded in Swiss best-practice and evidence-based methodology, identified interwoven causes underpinning the conflict.

  • 1. Unequal Management Practice

    Findings confirmed a pattern of disparate workload allocation, with certain employees consistently bearing a disproportionate load. Others, closely tied to a senior manager, received preferential assignments and informal protection.

    Consequences included:

    • Heightened perceptions of arbitrariness and bias.
    • Resentment, disengagement, and defensive behaviour among team members.
    • Lower collective morale and declining productivity.

     

     

     

     

  • 2. Leadership Rivalry & Unmanaged Tension

    A rivalry between two senior leaders fuelled division within the team. The conflict, unaddressed for over a year, led to tribal groupings, passive resistance, and eroded the ability to resolve issues through normal management processes.

    Key symptoms:

      • Staff aligning with internal “factions”.
      • Communication and collaboration breakdown.
      • Decision paralysis affecting business outcomes.

     

     

     

     

     

  • 3. Serious Discriminatory Conduct Verified

    Multiple sources independently reported incidents of racist remarks and exclusion targeting one employee. Evidence matched across interviews and documentary review.

    The affected employee disclosed the psychological harm caused, including suicidal thoughts, demonstrating both the gravity of misconduct and the importance of thorough, trauma-sensitive, and confidential investigation practices under Swiss workplace protection law.

    The allegations included potential discriminatory treatment and conduct inconsistent with established Codes of Conduct. The seriousness of the allegations required careful evaluation against applicable legal requirements and recognised workplace standards.

Why the Corporate Internal Investigations Were Not Appropriate

Internal HR Was Not Trusted, External Expertise Was Required. Attempts to address these issues internally failed for several reasons:

  • Employees doubted HR’s ability to maintain impartiality, believing the process to be subject to internal politics.
  • The complexity and seriousness of the allegations exceeded normal HR investigation skills (e.g., critical incident interviewing, legal risk analysis, evidence synthesis).
  • The employees involved expressed concerns that internal investigations conducted solely by Human Resources could be vulnerable to allegations of institutional bias.

The organisation's HR Manager, Human Resources Business Partner, and senior business leader recognised that independent external investigators would provide greater credibility and procedural fairness.

Internal efforts risked further reputational harm and exposure to legal challenge for procedural flaws or perceived bias.

Key rationale for external, independent investigation:

Internal HR Process

  • Perceived as conflicted

  • Skill limitations in complex cases

  • Incomplete, disputed findings

Independent External Investigation

  • Neutral, trusted by all stakeholders

  • Specialist investigation methods, structured interviewing, evidence assessment, and legally defensible reporting.

  • Comprehensive, evidence-based, defensible in legal settings

Terraxis' Evidence-Led, Independent Investigation Methodology

Every workplace investigation conducted by Terraxis is designed to establish a reliable factual record through an impartial, structured, and evidence-based process. Our Workplace Investigators combine investigative expertise with a deep understanding of workplace dynamics, procedural fairness, and organisational governance to ensure findings are objective, defensible, and practical.

This investigation followed our rigorous three-stage methodology.

01

Step 1: Objective Document Review and Context Assessment

The investigation began with a comprehensive review of all available documentary evidence to understand the background of the allegations and establish an objective foundation before interviews commenced.

The Terraxis Investigator:

  • Reviewed relevant employment records, performance documentation, email correspondence, meeting records, HR files, and previous complaints.
  • Examined organisational reporting structures, management responsibilities, and workplace policies relevant to the allegations.
  • Constructed a detailed chronological timeline of key events to identify emerging patterns, inconsistencies, and areas requiring further investigation.
  • Assessed the available evidence to inform the interview strategy and ensure all relevant issues were explored systematically.

This initial assessment enabled the investigation to proceed from verified facts rather than assumptions or competing narratives.

02

Step 2: Confidential, Trauma-Informed Interviews

Terraxis conducted confidential, structured interviews with all relevant participants, including complainants, respondents, line managers, and corroborating witnesses.

Each interview was conducted using recognised investigative interviewing techniques designed to:

  • encourage accurate, complete, and independent accounts;
  • minimise suggestion, bias, or external influence;
  • provide participants with a psychologically safe environment in which to disclose sensitive information;
  • test the reliability and consistency of evidence through careful questioning and clarification; and
  • ensure procedural fairness by giving all parties an appropriate opportunity to respond to relevant allegations.

Throughout the process, investigators remained impartial, gathering evidence without making premature findings or credibility assumptions.

03

Step 3: Multi-Source Evidence Assessment and Findings

Following the interviews, all evidence was subjected to a structured analysis.

The Terraxis Investigator:

  • Cross-referenced witness accounts against documentary evidence and the established timeline.
  • Assessed areas of corroboration, inconsistency, and evidential gaps.
  • Distinguished between substantiated findings, uncorroborated allegations, and matters falling outside the agreed Terms of Reference.
  • Evaluated patterns of behaviour across multiple evidence sources rather than relying on isolated incidents or individual opinions.
  • Ensured conclusions were supported by the available evidence and documented transparently.

This disciplined analytical process enabled the organisation to understand not only what had occurred, but also the organisational factors that had contributed to the workplace conflict.

04

Investigation Report

The investigation concluded with a comprehensive, legally defensible report that presented the evidence in a clear, balanced, and structured manner.

The report:

  • Set out the investigation methodology and scope.
  • Summarised the relevant evidence gathered.
  • Presented factual findings supported by the available evidence.
  • Clearly differentiated confirmed findings from unsubstantiated allegations.
  • Identified breaches of organisational standards where supported by the evidence. 
  • Provided practical recommendations to assist organisational decision-makers in managing workplace risk, restoring trust, and strengthening future governance.

By combining objective evidence gathering, structured analysis, and procedural fairness, Terraxis provided the organisation with a robust factual foundation on which informed decisions could be made with confidence.




Preventing Scope Creep: Ensuring Relevance and Legal Defensibility

To ensure clarity and future-proof the intervention against procedural challenge, Terraxis Workplace Investigator:

  • Established and communicated clear terms of reference with Human Resources and executive sponsors
  • Kept inquiry tightly restricted to events, timeframes, and individuals relevant to current risk and misconduct
  • Documented (but did not expand on) older or tangential grievances, unless they directly related to the current complaint
  • Disciplined reporting: Separated factual findings, uncorroborated claims, and disciplinary measures to assist internal decision makers
  • At the outset, formal Terms of Reference were established and approved by Human Resources and executive sponsors. These Terms of Reference clearly defined the allegations, relevant parties, timeframe, evidence sources, and reporting expectations.

This maintained the integrity, objectivity, and practical utility of findings reducing future legal and reputational exposure.

Workplace Investigation Results and Organisational Impact

The independent investigation delivered measurable improvements across employee wellbeing, operational continuity, and organisational governance, providing a clear foundation for restoring trust and strengthening workplace processes

Short-term outcomes

  • Stress-related absenteeism: Drop by ~40% (Quarter vs. previous period)

  • Business continuity: 2 projects back on track delivered to schedule

  • Disciplinary/protective actions: The investigation informed appropriate organisational and corrective actions in accordance with applicable legal requirements and internal governance procedures.

  • Governance improvements: New “Person of Trust” appointed; whistleblower reporting protocols introduced

  • Managerial oversight: Enhanced policy, regular compliance review schedules introduced

Long-term outcomes

  • Eighteen months after the intervention, the affected unit recorded its strongest retention and performance results in three years.
  • The investigation's recommendations informed lasting improvements to workplace governance, including strengthened complaints processes, enhanced managerial oversight, and the introduction of a Employee Assistance Program and appointing  a Person of Trust.
  • The organisation established a stronger framework for managing future workplace concerns through greater transparency, procedural fairness, and independent oversight.

Rebuilding Organisational Health and Risk Resilience

Before the Terraxis intervention, a culture of silence dominated. Employees self-protected through defensive documentation, withheld grievances, and largely disengaged from internal processes.

Post-investigation:

  • Employees willingly participated in open dialogue
  • Staff confidence in fairness and psychological safety was restored
  • Transparent accountability for misconduct reinforced long-term values and risk assessment under Swiss Duty of Care obligations
  • The investigation strengthened collaboration between Human Resources, executive management, and department/unit leadership, creating a more transparent framework for managing future workplace concerns.

The ripple effect led to measurable cultural and performance improvement even amid continued business volatility.

Client Perspective: Restoring Trust Through Independent Investigation

"Before Terraxis’ intervention, the team operated in fear, documenting everything and refusing to raise issues because nobody trusted the process. The independent investigation changed everything: people spoke, we saw an honest picture for the first time, and implemented real solutions. Eighteen months later, this unit records our best people and performance figures in years."

– Group Human Resources Business Partner, Swiss multinational, 2026

 

Our Clients Share Their Experiences

Why Independent Investigation is Critical for HR Decision-Makers

A data-driven, independent workplace investigation by Terraxis delivers:

  • Objective fact-finding: Clear separation of personal grievance from organisational risk
  • Employee protection: Trauma-informed methodology and strict legal compliance
  • Risk minimisation: Reduces chances of costly litigation, negative publicity, or repeat incidents
  • Restored trust: Demonstrably improves psychological safety and trust in systems
  • Best-practice improvement: Strengthens internal policy, complaint management, and Swiss regulatory compliance

When trust is broken, only independent expertise can create the foundation for sustainable improvement and future risk mitigation.

About Terraxis

Terraxis is Switzerland’s trusted provider for independent workplace investigationsworkplace mediation, Employee Assistance Program (EAP) and "Person of Trust", as well as various Swiss regulatory compliance solutions for multinational employers. 

All investigations are conducted in full compliance with the Swiss Code of Obligations and relevant data protection requirements.

Contact Us

Ready to resolve your workplace risks?

Complex workplace problems demand more than internal solutions. When trust, performance, and legal risk intersect, an independent investigation delivers clarity, credibility, and actionable results.

Speak in confidence with an expert Workplace Investigator to protect your organisation’s people, reputation, and future.

Request a Confidential Workplace Investigation Consultation. Contact Terraxis!

Conflict Resolution in the Workplace - Steps and Strategies for HR Managers

30 June 2026

Topics covered: Learn how internal neutrality traps stall conflict resolution, discover a 5-step framework for HR leaders, and understand when to use independent external escalation to meet Swiss Art. 328 CO compliance.

Psychosocial Risk Assessment in Switzerland: Beyond Art. 328 CO Compliance

13 May 2026

Topics covered: Learn how Terraxis integrates nFADP compliance with EAP services to safeguard sensitive data, fulfill Art. 328 CO duties.

CSR Crisis Management: Safeguarding Social Integrity & Brand Reputation

13 May 2026

Topics covered: Discover how Terraxis helps corporates in Switzerland manage CSR crises, protect brand value, and fulfil regulatory duties under Art. 328 & 964 CO.

Incident Response Plan for HR Leaders

05 March 2026

Topics covered: Discover expert crisis management & incident response strategies for HR leaders in Switzerland and Internationally!

29 Sept. 2025 Feedback

30 September 2025

Topics covered: Voluntary Participation & Managing Company Information After Workplace Mediation

Workshop 29 September

25 September 2025

Terraxis organizes the next Mediation Workshop of the Fédération Genevoise Médiation

19 May 2025 Feedback

20 May 2025

Topics covered: Managing participants in mediation – Handling major unexpected events – Managing the mediator’s emotions

Alternative Dispute Resolution Services: Mediation, Arbitration, & Ombudsman. Fostering psychological safety in the workplace through relationship engineering, enhancing company performance, and building a Fearless Organization.


Contact details
  • Terraxis SA
    Rue de la tour de l’Ile 1
    1204 Genève

  • Mail This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.